Conventional oil and gas accumulations are typically concentrated by buoyancy-driven aquifer pathways into discrete geological traps, which can be detected from the surface. In low-permeability reservoirs, hydraulic fracturing is necessary to extract the oil and gas, especially in the absence of natural fractures.

Unconventional reservoirs, by contrast, are regionally dispersed over large areas without indicative trap geometry. The oil and gas in these reservoirs are generally low-density resources, often trapped within the rock by strong capillary forces that prevent natural flow through buoyancy, particularly in extremely low-permeability reservoirs. Consequently, hydraulic fracturing is also required to produce from these wells.

Despite the need for hydraulic fracturing in both low-permeability conventional and unconventional reservoirs, the development of unconventional reservoirs has led to the establishment of unique best practices. These practices have challenged conventional approaches to fracture conductivity while still meeting well-production needs, albeit with challenges in production sustainability.

Recently, there has been growing interest in understanding best practices for unconventional reservoirs to enhance production sustainability. This has led to engaging discussions and ideas that could challenge some of the established unconventional practices. It is crucial to consider the significant differences in unconventional reservoirs, which may necessitate tailored solutions and methodologies.

This panel aims to facilitate constructive discussions around these topics, fostering collaboration and innovation in optimising production from unconventional reservoirs.